Vascular risk factor profiles in the first phase of the Scottish Heart andArterial Risk Prevention (SHARP) Survey, 1991-1996

Citation
S. Mcewan et al., Vascular risk factor profiles in the first phase of the Scottish Heart andArterial Risk Prevention (SHARP) Survey, 1991-1996, INT ANGIOL, 19(3), 2000, pp. 197-205
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03929590 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
197 - 205
Database
ISI
SICI code
0392-9590(200009)19:3<197:VRFPIT>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background. The SHARP survey data comprises personal information, family hi story, lifestyle and risk factor prevalence for 19,400 men and women sample d from the Scottish working population between 1991 and 1996. The purpose o f the survey was the achievement of a clearer understanding of coronary ris k factor prevalence in the working population of Scotland; the education of that population through counselling and advice; and a clearer appreciation of an individual's risk factor profile as a predictor for future events. I n this paper a selection of attributes is explored for the information they yield about the characteristics of an apparently healthy population. Compa risons are drawn with earlier studies. Methods. A mobile risk factor screening unit toured workplaces throughout S cotland and recorded information on age, sex, occupation, social class, per sonal and family history, smoking, alcohol and salt consumption, body mass index, blood pressure, glucose and total cholesterol. Results. The variation in measured levels for common risk factors in a samp le of apparently healthy Scottish people shows substantial differences from the measured variation in an unstratified survey. Conclusions. Across all conventional coronary risk factor measurements, wor king Scottish people are uniformly "more healthy" than the general populati on. A comparison of trend with age for male and female smokers and non-smok ers in cholesterol level shows no difference between smokers and non-smoker s; a similar comparison for body mass index and weight shows some consisten t differences but without statistical significance.