This study contrasted the moderating effects of deriving integrative meanin
g (a primary appraisal process) with the use of specific, cognitive-behavio
ral strategies (a secondary appraisal process) in confronting stressors inv
olving harm or loss. Eighty young adults and eighty older participants with
varying levels of chronic illness were assessed. Open-ended responses to r
ecalled experiences with illness and death were coded for integrative meani
ng and use of specific cognitive-behavioral strategies. In young adults wit
h higher levels of chronic illness, a greater tendency to use specific cogn
itive-behavioral strategies was related to higher morale. In older particip
ants, a greater tendency to derive integrative meaning was related to incre
ased morale, regardless of illness levels.