Diabetes mellitus, a prevalent disorder worldwide, is associated with syste
mic adverse sequelae, such as wound healing alterations, which may affect o
sseointegration of dental implants. This prospective multicenter study asse
ssed the success of 2-stage endosseous root-form implants (3 different impl
ant systems) placed in the mandibular symphysis of 89 male type 2 diabetic
subjects. The implants were uncovered approximately 4 months after placemen
t, restored with an implant-supported, Hader bar clip-retained overdenture,
and maintained at scheduled follow-up data collection examinations for 60
months after loading. Sixteen (9.0%) of the 178 implants failed. Life table
methods calculated implant survival at approximately 88%, from prosthesis
placement through the 60-month follow-up, and at approximately 90% from imp
lant placement through the observation period. No implants failed between s
urgical placement and uncovering, 5 failed at uncovering, 7 failed after un
covering before prosthesis placement, and 4 failed after prosthesis placeme
nt Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values
were determined before implant placement (baseline) and approximately 4 mon
ths later at surgical uncovering (follow-up). The 5-year implant outcomes (
successes versus failures) were analyzed against the following predictor va
riables: (1) baseline and followup FPG values, (2) baseline and follow-up H
bA1c values, (3) subject age, (4) duration of diabetes (years), (5) baselin
e diabetic therapy, (6) smoking history, and (7) implant length. Regression
analysis found only duration of diabetes (P < .025) and implant length (P
< .001) to be statistically significant predictors of implant failure. Ther
e was no statistically significant difference in failure rates between the
3 different implant systems used. This study supports the use of dental imp
lants in type 2 diabetic patients.