S. Kruper et al., NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER GYNECOLOGICAL L APAROSCOPY - PROPOFOL SUFENTANIL VERSUS THIOPENTONE/ISOFLURANE/SUFENTANIL/, Anasthesiologie und Intensivmedizin, 38(6), 1997, pp. 292-295
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology,"Emergency Medicine & Critical Care
There is a high incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after l
aparoscopic surgery. We evaluated the effect of propfol/sufentanil ana
esthesia in comparison to isoflurane/thiopental/sufentanil anaesthesia
with regard to postoperative nausea, vomiting, recovery and shivering
, Methods: Sixty ASA I and II patients scheduled for gynaecological la
paroscopy were randomly assigned to two groups, Anaesthesia in Group o
ne (n = 30) was induced with sufentanil 0,4 mu g.kg(-1), thiopental 4
mg.kg(-1) and atracurium 0,4 mg.kg(-1). Anaesthesia was maintained wit
h isoflurane 1,2 +/- 0,3 MAC and repetitive doses of sufentanil and at
racurium. Group two received propofol 1,5 to 2 mg.kg(-1) and an identi
cal dose of sufentanil and atracurium as group one, For maintenance we
gave propofol 6 to 10 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) and repetitive doses of sufenta
nil and atracurium. N2O was avoided in both groups, For postoperative
examination we used a scoring system, Results: In both groups 9 patien
ts suffered from nausea, in group one 2 patients vomited, in group two
1 patient, Group two had a higher recovery score when arriving in the
postanaesthetic care unit, After 30 min there was no further differen
ce in recovery between the groups, For shivering no intergroup differe
nces were found, Conclusion: A nitrous oxide free isoflurane/sufentani
l lon flow anaesthesia for laparoscopies produces clinically comparabl
e results to a propofol/sufentanil anaesthesia however at lower costs.