Dw. Graff et al., Effect of fluoxetine on carvedilol pharmacokinetics, CYP2D6 activity, and autonomic balance in heart failure patients, J CLIN PHAR, 41(1), 2001, pp. 97-106
The objective of this study was to examine the pharmacokinetic and pharmaco
dynamic consequences of concomitant administration of fluoxetine and carved
ilol in heart failure patients. Fluoxetine (20 mg) or matching placebo was
administered in a randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study to 1
0 patients previously identified as extensive metabolizers of CYP2D6 substr
ates. Patients were maintained on a carvedilol dose of 25 or 50 mg bid and
given fluoxetine/placebo for a minimum of 28 days. Plasma was collected ove
r the 12-hour carvedilol dosing interval, and the concentrations of the R() and S(-) enantiomers of carvedilol were measured. CYP2D6 phenotype was as
sessed during each study period using dextromethorphan (30 mg). Changes in
autonomic modulation between study periods were measured by heart rate vari
ability in the time and frequency domains using ambulatory electrocardiogra
phic monitoring. Compared to placebo, fluoxetine coadministration resulted
in a 77% increase in mean (+/-SD) R(+) enantiomer AUC(0-12) (522 +/- 413 vs
. 927 +/- 506 ng.h/mL, p = 0.01) and a nonsignificant increase in S(-) enan
tiomer AUC (244 +/- 185 vs. 330 +/- 179 ng.h/ml, p = 0.17). Mean apparent o
ral clearance for both enantiomers decreased significantly with fluoxetine
administration (R(+): 10.3 +/- 7.2 vs. 4.5 +/- 2.2 mL/min/kg; S(-): 22.5 +/
- 12.3 vs. 12.6 +/- 7.4 mL/min/kg; p 0.004 and 0.03, respectively). No diff
erences in adverse effects, blood pressure, or heart rate were noted betwee
n treatment groups, and there were no consistent changes in heart rate vari
ability parameters. In conclusion, fluoxetine administration resulted in a
stereospecific inhibition of carvedilol metabolism, with the R(+) enantiome
r increasing to a greater extent than the S(-) enantiomer. However, this in
teraction was of little clinical significance in our sample population. Jou
rnal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2001;41:97-106 (C) 2001 the American College
of Clinical Pharmacology.