Diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas in Japan and Western countries: Proposal for a new classification system of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia
Rj. Schlemper et al., Diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas in Japan and Western countries: Proposal for a new classification system of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia, J GASTR HEP, 15, 2000, pp. G49-G57
Background: Large differences have been found between Western and Japanese
pathologists in their diagnosis of adenoma/dysplasia and early carcinoma fo
r gastric, colorectal and oesophageal epithelial neoplastic lesions. Common
worldwide terminology based on clinical usefulness, that is, on neoplastic
severity and depth of invasion, is needed.
Methods: Thirty-one pathologists from 12 countries reviewed 35 gastric, 20
colorectal and 21 oesophageal biopsy and resection specimens. The extent of
diagnostic agreement between those with Western and Japanese viewpoints wa
s assessed by kappa statistics.
Results: Suspected or definite carcinoma was diagnosed in 17-66% of gastric
, in 5-40% of colorectal, and in 10-67% of oesophageal slides by pathologis
ts with a Western viewpoint, but in 77-94% of gastric, in 45-75% of colorec
tal and in 81-100% of oesophageal slides by pathologists with a Japanese vi
ewpoint (from Japan, Germany, Austria and UK). Overall, there was poor agre
ement between the conventional Western and Japanese diagnoses (kappa values
lower than 0.3 for gastric, colorectal and oesophageal lesions). There was
much better agreement among the pathologists (kappa values higher than 0.5
for gastric and colorectal lesions) when the original assessments of the s
lides were regrouped into the five categories of the following classificati
on of GI epithelial neoplasia we hereby propose: C1, negative for neoplasia
; C2, indefinite for neoplasia; C3, mucosal low-grade neoplasia (low-grade
adenoma/dysplasia); C4, mucosal high-grade neoplasia (high-grade adenoma/dy
splasia plus mucosal carcinoma); C5, submucosal invasion of neoplasia.
Conclusions: The intercountry differences in the diagnoses of adenoma/dyspl
asia and early carcinoma can, in large part, be resolved by adopting termin
ology based on neoplastic severity and depth of invasion. Problems with def
ining intramucosal invasion are thus avoided. Moreover, grouping high-grade
adenoma/dysplasia and mucosal carcinoma together in one category is clinic
ally useful, as patients with small mucosal neoplastic lesions can be cured
by endoscopic local resection. (C) 2000 Blackwell Science Asia Pty Ltd.