Although mammography is well established as a first-line tool for breast ca
ncer screening and detection, efforts to develop complementary procedures c
ontinue. Observation of Tc-99m-sestamibi tumor uptake provided the impetus
for its evaluation as an adjunctive technique. This trial's objectives were
to determine in a multicenter trial the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-sesta
mibi in women with suspected breast cancer and to investigate factors influ
encing diagnostic accuracy, Methods: Our multicenter trial enrolled 673 wom
en (387 with nonpalpable abnormalities; 286 with palpable abnormalities) sc
heduled for excisional biopsy or mastectomy. Blinded and unblinded interpre
tations of scintigraphic images were compared with core laboratory establis
hed histopathologic diagnoses to define the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-se
stamibi breast imaging. Results: Blinded readers' diagnostic accuracy was 7
8%-81%. Inter-reader agreement was excellent, ranging from 95% to 100% (kap
pa = 0.82-0.99). Overall institutional sensitivity and specificity for 99mT
c-sestamibi breast imaging were 75.4% and 82.7%, respectively. In this popu
lation with a 40.1% disease prevalence, the positive predictive value was 7
4.5% and the negative predictive value was 83.4%. The negative predictive v
alue was 94% in patients with a 40% or lower mammographic likelihood of bre
ast cancer. Sensitivity was higher for palpable abnormalities; specificity
was higher for nonpalpable abnormalities. Sensitivity was decreased for tum
ors <1 cm in largest dimension but appeared not to be affected by patient's
age. Conclusion: As an adjunct to current procedures, 99mTc-sestamibi brea
st imaging may contribute to patient management decisions in selected popul
ations, including women with dense breasts, mammographically indeterminate
lesions >1 cm, and palpable abnormalities.