Objective: The choice of solution for gastrointestinal tonometry influ
ences the PCO2 measurement bias, precision and the time required for e
quilibration. We compared saline with buffered solutions during in vit
ro tonometry, with respect to systematic and accidental measurement er
rors and equilibration time. Design: A prospective laboratory study. M
easurements: Saline, phosphate. phosphate bicarbonate and succinylated
gelatin solutions were equilibrated in a specialized blood gas tonome
ter at PCO(2)s of 2.7, 3.6, 4.5, 6.2 and 9.0 kPa, using calibration ga
ses. Accidental errors were determined: the within-syringe decline of
PCO2 and the effects of handling errors (five up and down movements of
the plunger). The PCO2 build up in gastrointestinal tonometers was de
termined in 5000 ml saline baths with fixed PCO2 levels of 2.7 and 9.0
kPa. Results: The build up of PCO2 in phosphate bicarbonate and gelat
in was about 4 and 2 times slower than in saline and phosphate, respec
tively, both for gas and gastrointestinal tonometers. The bias of the
measured PCO2 at equilibrium was -15 % for saline, and between -1 and
3 % for phosphate. phosphate bicarbonate and gelatin. The precision wa
s comparable among the solutions: 2 +/- 1% for saline, 2 +/- 1 % for p
hosphate. 1 +/- 0 % for phosphate bicarbonate and 1 +/- 1 % for gelati
n. The accidental errors were virtually absent with phosphate bicarbon
ate, intermediate with gelatin and largest with saline and phosphate.
Conclusion: Phosphate bicarbonate buffer and succinylated gelatin allo
w accurate PCO2 measurements, but their equilibration is too slow for
clinical application. The advantage of phosphate over saline solution
is a smaller bias only. Thus, both saline and phosphate are currently
the tonometer solutions of choice, provided that strictly anaerobic co
nditions are applied and the bias by the blood gas analyzer is known.