Most patients with sciatica (often caused by disc herniations) are managed
conservatively at first. The natural course seems to be favorable. The addi
tional value of many conservative therapies remains controversial. Because
a systematic review of the conservative treatment of sciatica is lacking, s
uch a review was carried out. After a standardized literature search and se
lection procedure, methodology and outcome of randomized controlled trials
(RCTs) were assessed by three observers. If possible, trial results were st
atistically pooled (:= metaanalysis). The 19 RCTs that were selected showed
greatly varying methodologic quality. Pooled odds ratios were calculated f
or several treatment types. Neither traction, exercise therapy, nor drug th
erapy was unequivocally effective. Epidural steroids may be beneficial for
subgroups of nerve root compression. The literature suggests possible effec
tiveness of epidural steroids for sciatica. The authors recommend trials to
investigate this treatment option further, especially with regard to patie
nt subgroups (e.g., acute sciatica). The effects of clinical heterogeneity
and methodology on review results are illustrated.