Conservative treatment of sciatica: A systematic review

Citation
Pcaj. Vroomen et al., Conservative treatment of sciatica: A systematic review, J SPINAL D, 13(6), 2000, pp. 463-469
Citations number
56
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS
ISSN journal
08950385 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
463 - 469
Database
ISI
SICI code
0895-0385(200012)13:6<463:CTOSAS>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Most patients with sciatica (often caused by disc herniations) are managed conservatively at first. The natural course seems to be favorable. The addi tional value of many conservative therapies remains controversial. Because a systematic review of the conservative treatment of sciatica is lacking, s uch a review was carried out. After a standardized literature search and se lection procedure, methodology and outcome of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed by three observers. If possible, trial results were st atistically pooled (:= metaanalysis). The 19 RCTs that were selected showed greatly varying methodologic quality. Pooled odds ratios were calculated f or several treatment types. Neither traction, exercise therapy, nor drug th erapy was unequivocally effective. Epidural steroids may be beneficial for subgroups of nerve root compression. The literature suggests possible effec tiveness of epidural steroids for sciatica. The authors recommend trials to investigate this treatment option further, especially with regard to patie nt subgroups (e.g., acute sciatica). The effects of clinical heterogeneity and methodology on review results are illustrated.