Objective: Patients with thoracic aortic injury (TAI) usually have sustaine
d other major trauma, and may require aggressive shock resuscitation. In th
e 24 hours after aortic repair and during resuscitation, our cardiothoracic
surgeons request intravenous nitroprusside to maintain mean arterial press
ure (MAP) less than 90 mm Hg to minimize bleeding at the repair. We compare
d the resuscitation response of patients who sustained major torso trauma (
MTT) and TAI with that of patients who had MTT with no TAI to determine whe
ther nitroprusside can effectively central MAP during resuscitation and whe
ther use of nitroprusside, because of its peripheral vasodilatory, effects,
is associated with a favorable resuscitation response.
Methods: During the 9-month study period, 11 patients who sustained TAI and
38 patients who sustained MTT with no TAI met multiple organ failure risk/
shock criteria and were resuscitated by a standardized protocol emphasizing
volume loading and hemoglobin replacement to maintain systemic oxygen deli
very index (Do(2)I) greater than or equal to 600 mL O-2/min-m(2) for the Fi
rst 24 intensive care unit hours, Fur TAI patients, postoperative managemen
t included intravenous nitroprusside infusion titrated by the bedside nurse
to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) less than 90 mm Bg during the sam
e 24 hours. Data were obtained prospectively during resuscitation. Retrospe
ctively, the resuscitation response of TAI and non-TAI patients was compare
d.
Results: For the TAI group, nitroprusside effectively controlled MAP (range
, 77-87 mm Hg); for the non-TAI group, mean MAP exceeded 95 mm Hg within 5
hours, During the first 8 hours, MAP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, a
nd systemic vascular resistance index were less, and Do(2)I was greater for
the TAI than for the non-TAI group. The resuscitation goal of Do(2)I great
er than or equal to 600 mL O-2/min-m(2) was attained at 4 hours for the TAI
group, and was attained at 12 hours for the non-TAI group. No revisions of
aortic repairs were required during or as a result of resuscitation.
Conclusion: During aggressive shock resuscitation, control of MAP using nit
roprusside is feasible and is associated with a favorable resuscitation res
ponse. Nitroprusside may he a useful adjunct during shock resuscitation of
MTT as a vasoactive agent that promotes peripheral tissue perfusion.