Comparative characterisation of different commercial UF membranes for drinking water production

Citation
B. Schlichter et al., Comparative characterisation of different commercial UF membranes for drinking water production, J WAT SER T, 49(6), 2000, pp. 321-328
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Civil Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF WATER SERVICES RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA
ISSN journal
16069935 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
321 - 328
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-7214(200012)49:6<321:CCODCU>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
In this study, nine commercially available ultrafiltration membranes used i n drinking water production were characterised. The aim of the study was to compare the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) and the membrane permeability of a selection of currently available ultrafiltration membranes. Permeabili ty and MWCO are important criteria for the selection of ultrafiltration mem branes with regard to efficiency and rejection of dissolved and particulate substances. This study provides an overview of the differences in cut-off and permeability between commercial UF membranes with similar specification s. To this end, tests were conducted using eight hollow fibre membranes with e ffective membrane surface areas of between 0.04 and 0.26 m(2) and one type of flat sheet membrane with an effective filtration area of 0.0044 m(2). Cr oss-flow filtration experiments using a mixture of dextrane as a feed solut ion were performed to determine MWCO. The molecular weight of the dextrane used in the feed solution ranged from 8-2,000 kD. The concentration distrib ution of the dextrane in the feed and the permeate was determined by gel pe rmeation chromatography (GPC) in the range of 10-1,000 kD. These tests showed that, from the nine UF membranes tested, four of them di splayed a MWCO of below 1,000 kD with pure water permeabilities of 180-400 l/(m(2) . h . bar). A further four displayed no MWCO in the range examined (10-1,000 kD) with pure water permeabilities of 130-880 l/(m(2) . h . bar) and therefore their cut-offs must be in the range above 1,000 kD. One membr ane, which showed no rejection for any dextrane fraction with a pure water permeability of 2,700 l/(m(2) . h . bar), could be classed as a microfiltra tion membrane.