M. Tupper et Kw. Able, Movements and food habits of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in Delaware Bay (USA) salt marshes: comparison of a restored and a reference marsh, MARINE BIOL, 137(5-6), 2000, pp. 1049-1058
There has been much recent interest in restoration of salt-marsh habitats t
o their natural structure and function. However, the criteria for success o
f such restorations are not well-defined. As part of a larger program to ev
aluate the restoration of a former salt-hay farm bordering Delaware Bay, Ne
w Jersey, USA, we monitored the response of a large predator, the striped b
ass Morone saxatilis, to the restoration. During June to October 1998 we co
mpared tidal and diel movements and food habits of juvenile and adult strip
ed bass (n = 82, 212 to 670 mm fork length) between a restored marsh and an
adjacent reference marsh with similar physical characteristics (depth, sal
inity, temperature). Striped bass movements at both sites were characterize
d by ultrasonic tracking with small, surgically implanted tags (21 d rated
battery-life). Striped bass (n = 23, 421 to 610 mm fork length) were tagged
and released near the main creek mouths at both the restored in = 14) and
reference (n = 9) marshes. At both sites, striped bass tended to move up th
e main creek during ebb tide. At the restored site, ebb tide upstream-movem
ents ranged from 0.1 to 3.5 km from the main creek mouth(mean = 1.2 km). Du
ring the upstream movement, the fish typically stopped every 200 to 300 m (
presumably to feed) for 1 to 2 h. At the reference site, few of the tagged
fish moved farther than 100 to 200 m upstream from the main channel mouth a
t ebb tide, perhaps in response to somewhat lower dissolved oxygen at this
site. During flood tide, tagged fish at both sites moved out into Delaware
Bay, where they remained within 200 to 500 m of the creek mouth. Striped ba
ss were sampled with gill nets to determine additional aspects of habitat u
se and food habits. Striped bass in both marshes were much more abundant at
creek mouths (catch per unit effort, CPUE = 1.17) than in the upper reache
s of the creeks (CPUE = 0.13). In the creek mouths, CPUE was greater at the
restored site (CPUE = 1.8) than at the reference site (CPUE = 0.5). At bot
h sites, most fish (approx. 80%) were collected on the late ebb or early fl
ood tides, i.e. around low tide, when prey were presumably concentrated at
the creek mouths. Stomach contents of bass from both restored and reference
marshes (n = 59, 212 to 670 mm fork length) revealed that striped bass wer
e eating mostly blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), grass shrimp (Palaemonetes
vulgaris), sand shrimp (Crangon septemspinosa), mummichog (Fundulus hetero
clitus), and various unidentifiable fishes (probably anchovies, Anchoa mitc
hilli, and Atlantic silverside Menidia menidia). In conclusion, the restore
d marsh supported larger numbers of striped bass than the reference marsh,
but there was little difference in the pattern of creek utilization or food
habits at either site. Thus, the restored marsh appears to be functioning
in a similar manner to the reference marsh for these large predators.