Kohlberg and Mertens (1986) argued that a solution concept to a game should
be invariant under the addition or deletion of an equivalent strategy and
not require the use of weakly dominated strategies. In this paper we study
which of these requirements are satisfied by Kalai and Samet's (1984) conce
pts of persistent equilibria and persistent retracts. While none of these c
oncepts has all the invariance properties, we show that a slight rephrasing
of the notion of a persistent retract leads to a notion satisfying them al
l. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.