Objective: to develop a self-administered questionnaire (OPQ) to assess the
patient's knowledge about osteoporosis. Methods: an initial item pool of 7
1 questions was developed with input from clinicians involved in the manage
ment of patients with osteoporosis. It was piloted in ten patients for face
validity and comprehension. The questionnaire was then administered to 50
first-time attendees at a specialist osteoporosis unit. After item analysis
using index of difficulty and index of discrimination, 20 items were selec
ted for the final questionnaire (OPQ). These were in the areas of general i
nformation (5), risk factors (7), consequences and treatment (four each). R
esults: the average index of difficulty and index of discrimination (D) of
the 20 items was 0.56 (> 0.75 is suggestive of a poor discriminator) and 54
.8% (D value of 50% is associated with highest level of item discrimination
) respectively. This means that all the items actively discriminated betwee
n high and low scorers. The Flesch readability index was 74.3 (a score betw
een 70 and 100 means a document is easily understood) and the reliability c
oefficient was 0.84 (acceptable range 0.8-0.9). Criterion validity (verific
ation that the scale measures what it claims to measure) was confirmed by t
he method of contrasted groups where members of an osteoporosis awareness c
harity had a significantly higher score than the first time attendees (13.6
+/- 4.3 vs. 8.5 +/- 5.4; P = 0.003). Conclusions: we have developed a self
-report, 20-item questionnaire (OPQ) to assess the patient's knowledge abou
t osteoporosis. Psychometric analysis has shown that the items have a satis
factory index of difficulty and discrimination. The OPQ is internally relia
ble, valid and easily understandable. It can be used to identify individual
s in need of educational interventions as well as assess the effectiveness
of education efforts as a part of management of osteoporosis. (C) 2000 Else
vier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.