Recognition of self-produced movement in a case of severe neglect

Citation
E. Daprati et al., Recognition of self-produced movement in a case of severe neglect, NEUROCASE, 6(6), 2000, pp. 477-486
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
NEUROCASE
ISSN journal
13554794 → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
477 - 486
Database
ISI
SICI code
1355-4794(2000)6:6<477:ROSMIA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
We report the case of a 50-year-old man (Mr PA) who sustained a right thala mic-temporo-parietal lesion resulting in severe hemispatial neglect and som atoparaphrenic delusions in the acute phase. One month after the lesion, Mr PA's ability to recognize his own movements was systematically analysed by means of an apparatus which allowed either the patient's or the examiner's moving hand to be displayed on a single screen. When viewing the examiner' s hand, the patient saw a movement which was either identical (congruent co ndition) or different from his own (incongruent condition). In the latter c onditions, both the examiner's and the patient's hand movements were synchr onized in order to have the best match in both space and time. Since both h ands were covered with identical gloves, attribution judgements could be pr oduced only by comparing an internal representation of the executed movemen t to the visual image presented on the screen. When moving his contralesion al hand, Mr PA systematically denied being the owner of the hand displayed on the screen, regardless of whether it was his own or the examiner's. Attr ibution errors were very frequent, and denial of ownership was associated w ith confabulatory behaviour. The behaviour of Mr PA was compared to that of four normal subjects and two neglect patients. In neither group did subjec ts present feeling of non-belonging towards their own hand, or confabulator y behaviour. In agreement with previous reports relating abnormal activity in the right parietal cortex and misattribution of the source of an action, we suggest that the behaviour of Mr PA is a consequence of a disorder of b ody awareness. More precisely, we propose that in the present case, the bod y-reference system was defective, thus inducing the patient to refuse owner ship of the hand presented on the screen, even when it was actually his own .