Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex

Citation
Hj. Rosen et al., Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex, NEUROLOGY, 55(12), 2000, pp. 1883-1894
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
NEUROLOGY
ISSN journal
00283878 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1883 - 1894
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-3878(200012)55:12<1883:NCORFA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objective: To determine neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after le ft frontal injury. Methods: The authors studied the verbal performance of p atients with infarcts centered in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), us ing a battery of attention-demanding lexical tasks that normally activate t he left IFG and a simpler reading task that does not normally recruit the l eft IFG. The authors used positron emission tomography (PET) and functional MRI (fMRI) to record neural activity in the same group of patients during word-stem completion, one of the attention-demanding lexical tasks. To iden tify potential neural correlates of compensation/recovery, they analyzed th e resulting data for the group as a whole (PET, fMRI) and also for each par ticipant (fMRI). Results: Patients with damage to the left IFG were impaire d on all attention-demanding lexical tasks, but they completed the word-rea ding tasks normally. The imaging studies demonstrated a stronger-than-norma l response in the right IFG, a region homologous to the damaged left IFG. T he level of activation in the right IFG did not correlate with verbal perfo rmance, however. In addition, a perilesional response within the damaged le ft IFG was localized in the two patients who gave the best performance in t he word-stem completion task and showed the most complete recovery from aph asia. Conclusions: Right-IFG activity may represent either the recruitment of a preexisting neural pathway through alternative behavioral strategies o r an anomalous response caused by removal of the left IFG. Perilesional act ivity in the left IFG may represent sparing or restoration of normal functi on in peri-infarctual tissue that was inactive early on after injury. This activity may be of greater functional significance than right IFG activity because it was associated with more normal verbal performance.