Five-day cefdinir course vs. ten-day cefprozil course for treatment of acute otitis media

Citation
Sl. Block et al., Five-day cefdinir course vs. ten-day cefprozil course for treatment of acute otitis media, PEDIAT INF, 19(12), 2000, pp. S147-S152
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
ISSN journal
08913668 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
S
Pages
S147 - S152
Database
ISI
SICI code
0891-3668(200012)19:12<S147:FCCVTC>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Objective. To compare the clinical efficacy of a 5-day cefdinir course with a 10-day cefprozil course in the treatment of pediatric acute otitis media (AOM). Design. Comparative, investigator-blinded multicenter trial. Setting: Primary care, ambulatory, Patients. Children ages 6 months through 12 years with clinical symptoms an d tympanic membrane signs of AOM, plus tympanometric-confirmed middle ear e ffusion in at least 1 ear. Of the 435 patients enrolled in the study, 373 w ere evaluable, Intervention. Patients received cefdinir 14 mg/kg/day divided twice a day f or 5 days or cefprozil 30 mg/kg/day divided twice a day for 10 days. Main o utcome measures. Clinical resolution of tympanic membrane signs and symptom s of AOM determined at end of therapy on Study Days 9 to 11, Results. The clinical cure rate at end of therapy was 80% (152 of 190) for cefdinir-treated patients and 82.5% (151 of 183) for cefprozil-treated pati ents (95% confidence interval, 10.43% to 5.4%), Diarrhea and overall advers e reactions, respectively, occurred in 7.8 and 13% of cefdinir-treated pati ents and in 4.2 and 12% of cefprozil-treated patients. Conclusions, A short course 5-day regimen of cefdinir was as clinically eff ective and well-tolerated as a 10-day regimen of cefprozil in the treatment of nonrefractory AOM.