Failure free survival following brachytherapy alone for prostate cancer: comparison with external beam radiotherapy

Background and purpose: To compare failure free survival (FFS) for brachyth erapy (BT) alone and external beam radiotherapy (EBXRT) alone. Materials and methods: Between 12/88 and 12/95, 1527 and 695 T-1 or T-2 Nx- No Mo prostate cancer patients (from the Arizona Oncology Services database ) were treated with either EBXRT or BT, respectively. The median age was 74 years. Median follow-up for EBXRT and BT patients was 41.3 and 51.3 months , respectively. Results: Overall FFS at 5 years for EBXRT and BT were 69 and 71%, respectiv ely (P = 0.91). No significant difference in FFS at 5 years was observed be tween EBXRT and BT for either T-1 (78 vs. 83%, P = 0.47) or T-2 (67 vs. 67% , P = 0.89) tumours. Superior outcomes for Gleason 8-10 lesions treated wit h EBXRT vs. BT (5 years FFS 52 vs. 28%, P = 0.04) were observed; outcomes f or lower grade lesions when analysed by Gleason score alone did not signifi cantly differ according to treatment received. Patients with initial PSA va lues 10-20 ng/dl had an improved FFS with EBXRT vs. BT (70 vs. 53%, P = 0.0 01); outcomes for patients with initial PSA ranges 0-4 ng/dl, >4-10 ng/dl a nd >20 ng/dl did not differ significantly with treatment received. Conclusions: EBXRT and BT appear to be equally efficacious for low-risk pat ients having T-1/T-2 disease with Gleason scores <6 and PSA <10 ng/dl. Pati ents with Gleason scores 8-10 or PSA >10 ng/dl- < 20 ng/dl) appear to fare worse with BT alone compared with EBXRT. Neither EBXRT nor BT were particul arly effective for patients with a presenting PSA >20 ng/dl. (C) 2000 Elsev ier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.