When viewed as taxes, lotteries are routinely criticized as being both ineq
uitable and inefficient. But is this an entirely fair comparison? Frequentl
y lotteries are used in lieu of voluntary contributions by private charitie
s and governments when taxes are not feasible. When heterogeneous individua
ls with quasi-linear preferences participate in lotteries whose proceeds wi
ll be used to fund a public good, we find that, relative to voluntary contr
ibutions, wagers in the unique lottery equilibrium (a) increase the provisi
on of the public good, (b) are welfare improving, and (c) provide levels of
the public good close to first-best as the lottery prize increases.