Effective April 1, 1996, the Cirrus and Plus national ATM networks modified
their operating rules to allow ATM owners to impose surcharges on other ba
nks' customers who use their ATMs. Since 1996, surcharging has become wides
pread and has attracted a great deal of opposition. Among other things, sur
charge opponents argue that the imposition of surcharges will cause custome
rs to shift their deposits away from small banks that own few ATMs, toward
large banks that own extensive networks of ATMs. This article provides empi
rical evidence regarding the effects of surcharging on small banks' deposit
market shares and profitability.