Proscriptive planning exercises are critical to and generally accepted as i
ntegral to health planning at varying scales. These require specific instru
ments designed to predict future actions on the basis of present knowledge.
At the macrolevel of health economics, for example, a number of future-ori
ented Quality of Life Instruments (QL) are commonly employed. At the level
of individual decision making, on the other hand, Advance Directives (AD's)
are advanced as a means by which healthy individuals can assure their wish
es will be carried out if at some future point they are incapacitated. As p
roscriptive tools, both instrument classes;appear to share an axiomatic set
whose individual parts have not been rigorously considered. This paper att
empts to first identify and then consider a set of five axioms underlying f
uture oriented health planning instruments. These axioms are then critiqued
using data from a pre-test survey designed specifically to address their a
ssumptions. Results appear to challenge the validity of the axioms underlyi
ng the proscriptive planning instruments. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. Al
l rights reserved.