In this paper, I suggest an approach to the alleged problem with the Tarski
an formal definition of truth: its enumerative character seems to make it u
nable to capture our pretheoretic general understanding of truth. For this
purpose, after spelling out two requirements for extending an enumerative d
efinition to new cases, I examine to what extent Tarski's Convention T prov
ides what are needed for extending the Tarski's enumerative definition. I c
onclude that, though not explicitly providing what are needed, Convention T
does implicitly suggest something quite promising and provide necessary co
nceptual resources for its further modifications. Then I suggest a Tarskian
explicitly general definition of what it is to be a truth-definition on th
e basis of some theoretical and conceptual resources within Tarski's semant
ic theory, and I explain how it would make the Tarskian seemingly enumerati
ve formal definition have a general character in accord with our pretheoret
ic understanding of truth. Finally, I examine the current proposal in compa
rison with Davidson's approach and in the light of Hintikka's new perspecti
ve.