This prospectively designed study was aimed at comparing the results o
f two different treatment protocols in 29 infertile couples with prove
n male immunological infertility, i.e. a positive (>50%) mixed antiglo
bulin reaction (MAR) test (IgG and/or IgA), In the first protocol (gro
up I, n = 14) couples were treated with ovarian stimulation/intrauteri
ne insemination (IUI), followed by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) if no
pregnancy occurred after three IUI cycles. In the second protocol (gro
up II, n = 15), patients were treated with IVF as a first choice proce
dure, The decision to follow protocol 1 or 2 was made by the couples a
fter information about financial costs and expected success rates (acc
ording to the literature) for both treatment options, In group I, nine
patients (64.3%) conceived after a maximum of three IUI cycles wherea
s seven patients (46.6%) of group II became pregnant during the first
IVF cycle, The take-home baby rate per started IUI or IVF cycle was 27
.3% (9/33) and 44.4% (16/36) respectively with a take-home baby rate o
f 64.3% after three IUI cycles and 93.3% after three IVF attempts, To
conclude, both IUI and IVF yielded unexpectedly high pregnancy rates i
n this selected group of patients with long-standing infertility due t
o sperm surface (predominantly IgG) antibodies, Since cost benefit ana
lysis comparing superovulation IUI with IVF may favour a course of fou
r IUI cycles, we advocate superovulation IUI as the first line therapy
in male immunological infertility.