The Asian economic crisis of 1997 highlighted the inherent instability of t
he new worldwide economic order being created by highly mobile capital, and
also its destabilizing social and political effects, especially in the tra
nsitional societies which had proved so hospitable to the champions of glob
alization and to proffered capital inputs. Whether these societies are dest
ined to be subsumed and captured by globalization processes, or whether the
y and their citizens have any possibility of capturing some genuine benefit
s from advancing globalization, may rest on whether these transitional stat
es and societies can assert, or at least influence, the terms of their enga
gement with those processes. This will not be possible, however, if people,
societies and states capitulate in advance to the forces and processes of
globalization as irresistible. This issue is explored through the grounded
investigation of four key questions: do globalization processes serve any e
nds beyond themselves? How might one grasp the best, and make the most, of
globalization? Is the logic of the market immutable and inflexible transcul
turally, or is it amenable to varying forms of cultural inflection and poli
tical supervision? Can what globalization delivers be drawn upon selectivel
y, or is it instead a 'package-deal'?