Tk. Ross et Le. Zionts, COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS USED TO INHIBIT PHYSEAL GROWTH IN A RABBIT MODEL, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (340), 1997, pp. 236-243
A rabbit model was used to compare the rate, efficacy, and histologic
appearance of physeal growth inhibition effected by Phemister epiphysi
odesis, epiphyseal stapling, and percutaneous epiphysiodesis. Each tec
hnique led to an effective physeal closure, although the Phemister and
staple methods produced more rapid deceleration of growth, A slower r
ate of physeal closure was seen after percutaneous epiphysiodesis, bec
ause this technique produced a gap in the bone that initially filled w
ith fibrous tissue before forming bridges of trabecular bone leading t
o closure of the growth plate, Elevation of the periosteum alone produ
ced an initial growth stimulation followed by early physiologic physea
l closure, The amount of physis to ablate when doing a percutaneous ep
iphysiodesis is controversial, These results suggest that a percutaneo
us technique with limited physeal ablation, as used in the current stu
dy, effects a slower rate of growth inhibition than that by the Phemis
ter and staple techniques, A percutaneous technique that ablates a lar
ger portion of the physis may be desirable to obtain more rapid growth
inhibition.