Performance of CT in detection of bowel injury

Citation
St. Butela et al., Performance of CT in detection of bowel injury, AM J ROENTG, 176(1), 2001, pp. 129-135
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
ISSN journal
0361803X → ACNP
Volume
176
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
129 - 135
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-803X(200101)176:1<129:POCIDO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to identify relevant and reliable CT signs of bowel injury, to determine the overall performance of CT in de tection of bowel injuries, and to establish the effect of the training leve l of radiologists on this performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Abdominal CT scans of 112 patients with blunt abdomi nal trauma were prospectively and retrospectively reviewed. Fifty patients had proven bowel injuries (with or without other visceral injuries), wherea s 62 patients had no bowel injury and comprised the comparison or control g roup. Thirty-one of the 62 patients in the comparison group had surgical pr oof of abdominal but not bowel or mesenteric injuries. The retrospective re view of the 112 CT scans was performed randomly and individually by nine ra diologists unaware of the diagnosis, including three faculty abdominal radi ologists, three senior residents in training, and three junior residents in training. Individual performance and group performance were evaluated by r eceiver operating characteristic analysis, and interobserver agreement was tested. Individual CT signs as relevant predictors of bowel injury were ide ntified by logistic regression. RESULTS. Relevant predictors of bowel injury included mesenteric infiltrati on, bowel wall thickening, extravasation of vascular or enteric contrast ag ent, and the presence free air. In the retrospective blinded review, CT sho wed good to excellent interobserver reliability for individual CT signs as well as for diagnosis of bowel and visceral injuries. Faculty radiologists tended to diagnose injuries with greater accuracy and confidence, but they showed significantly better performance than residents only in diagnosing d uodenal perforation. For the prospective CT diagnosis of bowel injury, CT h ad a sensitivity of 64%, an accuracy of 82%, and a specificity of 97%. CONCLUSION. Rowel injuries are challenging to diagnose on CT. Radiologists with various levels of experience and expertise can achieve accurate and re producible results using a variety of CT criteria.