Thomas Smith presents an Aristotelian view of the common good that resemble
s much contemporary political theory in that it focuses on ethics rather th
an politics. Smith contends that Aristotle is a potent remedy to a society
in crisis due to its unconcern about the common good. Against Smith's apoli
tical reading of Aristotle, we examine how Aristotle's views of common adva
ntage, the multiple needs of citizens, and political friendship support nei
ther harmonizing conceptions of the good nor a personal "radical conversion
" that makes the common good our primary political concern. In engaging the
political Aristotle, we find instead that he is concerned with the necessa
ry conflict that resists attempts to arrive at the common advantage, with t
he material basis of good citizenship, and with the institutions and practi
ces that foster a good deliberative politics.