N. Katkhouda et al., Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, ANN SURG, 233(1), 2001, pp. 18-25
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (FS) in lapar
oscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and to compare it with stapled
fixation.
Summary Background Data
Laparoscopic hernia repair involves the fixation of the prosthetic mesh in
the preperitoneal space with staples to avoid displacement leading to recur
rence. The use of staples is associated with a small but significant number
of complications, mainly nerve injury and hematomas. FS (Tisseel) is a bio
degradable adhesive obtained by a combination of human-derived fibrinogen a
nd thrombin, duplicating the last step of the coagulation cascade. It can b
e used as an alternative method of fixation.
Methods
A prosthetic mesh was placed laparoscopically into the preperitoneal space
in both groins in 25 female pigs and fixed with either FS or staples or lef
t without fixation. The method of fixation was chosen by randomization. The
pigs were killed after 12 days to assess early graft incorporation. The fo
llowing outcome measures were evaluated: macroscopic findings, including gr
aft alignment and motion, tensile strength between the grafts and surroundi
ng tissues, and histologic findings (fibrous reaction and inflammatory resp
onse).
Results
The procedures were completed laparoscopically in 49 sites, Eighteen grafts
were fixed with FS and 16 with staples; 15 were not fixed. There was no si
gnificant difference in graft motion between the FS and stapled groups, but
the nonfixed mesh had significantly more graft motion than in either of th
e fixed groups. There was no significant difference in median tensile stren
gth between the FS and stapled groups. The tensile strength in the nonfixed
group was significantly lower than the other two groups. FS triggered a si
gnificantly stronger fibrous reaction and inflammatory response than in the
stapled and control groups. No infection related to method of fixation was
observed in any group.
Conclusion
An adequate mesh fixation in the extraperitoneal inguinal area can be accom
plished using FS. This method is mechanically equivalent to the fixation ac
hieved by staples and superior to nonfixed grafts. Biologic soft fixation w
ith FS will prevent early graft migration and will avoid the complications
associated with staple use.