Js. Solomkin et al., Results of a clinical trial of clinafloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin for intraabdominal infections, ANN SURG, 233(1), 2001, pp. 79-87
Objective
Clinafloxacin is a novel quinolone with wide activity against the plethora
of microorganisms encountered in intraabdominal infections. This trial was
performed to examine its clinical efficacy.
Summary Background Data
Clinafloxacin is representative of a new class of quinolones with considera
ble antimicrobial activity resulting from their mechanisms of action and ph
armacodynamics. There is, however, concern about specific potential toxicit
ies, including photosensitivity.
Methods
This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to compare c
linafloxacin with imipenem/cilastatin as adjuncts in the management of comp
licated intraabdominal infections.
Results
Five hundred twenty-nine patients were included in the intent-to-treat popu
lation, with 312 meeting all criteria for the valid population. Patients wi
th a wide range of infections were enrolled; perforated or abscessed append
icitis was the most common (approximately 50%). One hundred twenty-three of
the 150 valid patients treated with clinafloxacin (82%) had successful out
comes, as did 130 of the 162 (80%) treated with imipenem. For the intent-to
-treat groups, 219 of 259 patients treated with clinafloxacin (85%) had suc
cessful outcomes, as did 219 of 270 patients treated with imipenem/ cilasta
tin (81%). Treatment failure occurred in 39 patients who underwent drainage
. There were substantially more gramnegative organisms recovered from the p
atients with treatment failure who were initially treated with imipenem/cil
astatin.
Conclusions
The results of this study clearly demonstrate the safety and efficacy of cl
inafloxacin in the treatment of a range of intraabdominal infections, and i
n patients with a broad range of physiologic disturbances.