V. Gozzoli et al., Is it worth treating fever in intensive care unit patients? Preliminary results from a randomized trial of the effect of external cooling, ARCH IN MED, 161(1), 2001, pp. 121-123
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: Antipyresis is a common clinical practice in intensive care, al
though it is unknown if fever is harmful, beneficial, or a negligible adver
se effect of infection and inflammation.
Methods: In a randomized study, rectal temperature and discomfort were asse
ssed in 38 surgical intensive care unit patients without neurotrauma or sev
ere hypoxemia and with fever (temperature greater than or equal to 38.5 deg
reesC) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Eighteen patients recei
ved external cooling while 20 received no antipyretic treatment.
Results: Temperature and discomfort decreased similarly in both groups afte
r 24 hours. No significant differences in recurrence of fever, incidence of
infection, antibiotic therapy, intensive care unit and hospital length of
stay, or mortality were noted between the groups.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the systematic suppression of fever
may not be useful in patients without severe cranial trauma or significant
hypoxemia. Letting fever take its natural course does not seem to harm pat
ients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or influence the discomf
ort level and may save costs.