Sm. Gardiner et al., Cardiovascular effects of endothelin-1 and endothelin antagonists in conscious, hypertensive ((mRen-2)27) rats, BR J PHARM, 131(8), 2000, pp. 1732-1738
1 SB 209670 is a potent antagonist of the vasoconstrictor (ETA- and ETB-rec
eptor-mediated) and vasodilator (ETB-receptor-mediated) effects of endothel
in, whereas SB 234551 is relatively selective for the constrictor (ETA-rece
ptor-mediated) effects. Since we had previously found SB 209670 exerted ant
ihypertensive, vasodilator effects in conscious, heterozygous, transgenic (
(mRen-2)27) (abbreviated to TG) rats, here we compared the two antagonists
in that model, and assessed their chronic effects on responses to exogenous
endothelin-1. We did this to test our global hypothesis, namely, that SB 2
09670, but not SB 234551, would cause inhibition of the depressor effects o
f exogenous endothelin-1 in vivo, and that this differential effect would b
e associated with a more marked antihypertensive action of SB 234551 in TG
rats.
2 SB 209670 and SB 234551 (infused for 50 h) exerted similar, sustained, an
tihypertensive effects in TG rats.
3 The antihypertensive effects of the antagonists occurred at times when th
e presser effects of exogenous endothelin-1 were not significantly inhibite
d. Furthermore, SB 234551 did not exert a greater antihypertensive effect t
han SB 209670 at a time (i.e., 2-4 h) when the depressor effects of endothe
lin-1 were abolished by the latter, but not by the former (although this di
fferential action was lost after 24 h infusion).
4 The results caused us to reject the hypothesis that selective antagonism
of the vasoconstrictor effects of endothelin-1 would result in SB 234551 ex
erting a greater antihypertensive effect than SB 209670 in TG rats.