Kl. Bailey et al., Impact of agronomic practices and environment on diseases of wheat and lentil in southeastern Saskatchewan, CAN J PLANT, 80(4), 2000, pp. 917-927
To determine the effect of tillage and rotation on plant diseases, their se
verity and prevalence were monitored on spring wheat, lentil, and field pea
grown in rotation with zero and conventional tillage at Indian Head, SK, f
rom 1992 to 1995. Root disease severity of wheat was less under zero tillag
e than conventional tillage, but leaf spot severity was unchanged. Incidenc
e of the causal agents from roots was variable, such that Fusarium spp. wer
e higher under zero tillage than conventional and Bipolaris sorokiniana was
lower. Pyrenophora triticirepentis was the only foliar pathogen more preva
lent under zero tillage than conventional. Rotation did not affect the path
ogens causing root disease. However, the rotation of canaryseed-sunola-whea
t-lentil had higher disease severity and levels of Septoria tritci on wheat
compared with wheat-canola-wheat-lentil or wheat-pea-wheat-lentil. Neither
crop rotation nor tillage practice had a measurable impact on lentil disea
ses, but epidemics of Ascochyta lentis and Botrytis cinerea were most sever
e in treatments with the densest plant stands. Multivariate analyses explor
ed trends of tillage, rotation, and environment over years demonstrating th
at regardless of tillage or crop rotation practices, the annual environment
was the most important factor limiting the severity of disease and the pre
valence of causal agents in the complex.