Complications of femoral artery closure devices

Citation
D. Carey et al., Complications of femoral artery closure devices, CATHET C IN, 52(1), 2001, pp. 3-7
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
ISSN journal
15221946 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
3 - 7
Database
ISI
SICI code
1522-1946(200101)52:1<3:COFACD>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
We have examined our prospectively collected experience with femoral artery closure devices. Vasoseal (n = 937), Angioseal (N-742), and Techstar (n = 1001) were utilized consecutively in our laboratory for diagnostic and inte rventional femoral artery closures. Complications were compared to a simila r number of closures with manual compression (MC; n = 1019) before closure devices were utilized. The incidence of surgical repair, acute femoral clos ure, transfusion due to groin complications, readmission for groin complica tions, infection, and total complications were examined. We found that the Vasoseal and Angioseal devices were associated with higher rates of total c omplications than manual compression. The Techstar and manual compression h ad similar total complication rates. Acute femoral artery occlusion was a p otentially serious complication with the Angioseal device. Groin infection occurred with each of the closure devices but not with manual compression. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;52:3-7. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.