Silent ischemic interval on exercise test is a predictor of response to drug therapy: A randomized crossover trial of metoprolol versus diltiazem in stable angina

Citation
Sk. Dwivedi et al., Silent ischemic interval on exercise test is a predictor of response to drug therapy: A randomized crossover trial of metoprolol versus diltiazem in stable angina, CLIN CARD, 24(1), 2001, pp. 45-49
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
01609289 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
45 - 49
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-9289(200101)24:1<45:SIIOET>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Background and hypothesis: There is no method available to predict the rela tive antianginal efficacy of beta blockers and calcium-channel antagonists. The present study was undertaken to assess the role of silent ischemic int erval (SII) on exercise treadmill test (ETT) as a predictor of response to therapy with metoplolol and diltiazem in patients with stable angina. Methods: Thirty-four patients with stable angina were divided into two grou ps depending upon the presence or absence of an SII gap of at least 1 min b etween onset of ST depression and appearance of angina on ETT. Metoprolol ( 50-100 mg twice daily) and diltiazem (60-120 mg three times daily) were ran domly assigned for 6 weeks to patients in each group, and then patients wer e crossed over for further 6 weeks after a washout period of weeks. Antiang inal efficacy was assessed by clinical and exercise parameters. Results: In patients with SII, the clinical responder rate was better with metoprolol than with diltiazem (90 vs. 60%, respectively), and on ETT, meto prolol produced significant improvement in the total exercise lime (p < 0.0 1), time to 1 min ST depression (p < 0.01), time to angina (p < 0.01), and a significant decrease in peak rate-pressure product (p < 0.001), whereas d iltiazem had no significant effect on exercise parameters. However, in pati ents without SII, metoprolol and diltiazem had a similar clinical responder rate (57%), and both produced a significant increase in total exercise tim e (p < 0.01), time to 1 mm ST depression (p < 0.01), and time to angina (p < 0.01). In addition, metoprolol had a significant effect on peal; rate-pre ssure product (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Silent ischemic interval on ETT can be a predictor of response to antianginal therapy in stable angina, as patients with SII respond bette r to metoprolol and those without SII respond equally to both metoprolol an d diltiazem.