AIM: To determine if transvaginal ultrasound, including power Doppler exami
nation, can distinguish between women with and without pelvic congestion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six women with pelvic congestion were prospec
tively examined using transvaginal ultrasonography and standard uterine and
ovarian measurements made. Additionally, planimetric measurements of each
ovary were taken using an image analysis program to determine the cross-sec
tional area of ovarian stroma and follicles, if any, power Doppler images o
f adnexal vessels were obtained and planimetric estimates of surface area c
alculated, A congestion score was assigned to each patient, based on vein n
umber, diameter and morphology on grey-scale scanning. identical measuremen
ts were obtained from 19 asymptomatic women and results compared.
RESULTS: There mas no significant difference between women dth pelvic conge
stion and controls with respect to power Doppler or grey-scale images of ad
nexal vessels, or congestion score. However, women with pelvic congestion h
ad significantly larger and multicystic ovaries when compared to controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Transvaginal ultrasound measurements of adnexal vasculature, i
ncluding power Doppler measurements, cannot reliably distinguish women with
pelvic congestion from controls. However, ultrasound mag remain useful for
diagnosis of pelvic congestion, predominantly because it is able to visual
ize multi-cystic ovaries in these patients, Halligan, S. et nl. (2000). Cli
nical Radiology 954-958. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.