Hj. Milionis et Ms. Elisaf, Management of hypertension and dyslipidaemia in patients presenting with hyperuricaemia: Case histories, CURR MED R, 16(3), 2000, pp. 164-170
A number of studies have shown that hyperuricaemia is associated with an in
creased incidence of coronary heart disease. It has been proposed that the
elevated serum uric acid levels are linked to other risk factors, such as h
ypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes. Hyperuricaemia is commonly encount
ered in patients with essential hypertension and is considered as a risk fa
ctor for morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension. In addition,
lipid abnormalities (mainly hypertriglyceridaemia) are also found more fre
quently in hypertensive patients than in normotensives. There is evidence t
hat the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan, increases urate excre
tion by reducing reabsorption of urate in the renal proximal tubule. It is
also known that fibric acid derivatives (fibrates) have several beneficial
actions in addition to their lipid-lowering capacity. Fenofibrate administr
ation is associated with a uric acid lowering effect. lit this respect, we
present two patients with hypertension and dyslipidaemia together with elev
ated serum uric acid levels. We also discuss (in the format of questions an
d answers) the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the association of
serum uric acid with cardiovascular disease, and we review the relevant lit
erature to justify an evidence-based decision to choose an antihypertensive
agent (losartan) or a lipid-lowering drug (fenofibrate) with an additional
hypouricaemic effect.