Sm. Sebti et Ad. Hamilton, Farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitors in cancer therapy: important mechanistic and bench to bedside issues, EXPERT OP I, 9(12), 2000, pp. 2767-2782
The fact that proteins such as Pas, Pac and RhoA require farnesylation or g
eranylgeranylation to induce malignant transformation prompted many investi
gators to develop farnesyltransferase (FTase) and geranylgeranyltransferase
I (GGTase I) inhibitors (FTIs and GGTIs, respectively) as novel anticancer
drugs. Although FTIs have been shown to antagonise oncogenic signalling, r
everse malignant transformation, inhibit human tumour growth in nude mice a
nd induce tumour regression in transgenic mice without any signs of toxicit
y, their mechanism of action is not known. This review will focus on import
ant mechanistic issues as well as bench to bedside translational issues. Th
ese will include the relevance to cancer therapy of the alternative geranyl
geranylation of K-Ras when FTase is inhibited; a thorough discussion about
evidence for and against the involvement of inhibition of prenylation of Pa
s and RhoB in the mechanism of FTIs' antitumour activity as well as effects
of FTIs and GGTIs on the cell cycle machinery and the dynamics of bipolar
spindle formation and chromosome alignment during mitosis. Bench to bedside
issues relating to the design of hypothesis-driven clinical trials with bi
ochemical correlates for proof-of-concept in man will also be discussed. Th
is will include Phase I issues such as determining maximally tolerated dose
(MTD) versus effective biological dose (EBD), as well as whether Phase II
trials are still needed for clinical evaluations of anti-signalling agents.
Other questions that will be addressed include: what levels of inhibition
of FTase activity are required for tumour response in Phase II clinical eva
luations? What FTase substrates are most relevant as biochemical correlates
? Are signalling pathways such as H-Ras/PI3W/Akt and K-Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk sign
ificant biological readouts? Does Ras mutation status predict response? Wha
t are appropriate clinical end-points for FTI Phase II trials? For this lat
ter important question, time to tumour progression, median survival, percen
tage of patients that progress, clinical benefits and improvement in qualit
y of life will all be discussed.