Classification of river regimes: a context for hydroecology

Citation
Nm. Harris et al., Classification of river regimes: a context for hydroecology, HYDROL PROC, 14(16-17), 2000, pp. 2831-2848
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES
ISSN journal
08856087 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
16-17
Year of publication
2000
Pages
2831 - 2848
Database
ISI
SICI code
0885-6087(200011/12)14:16-17<2831:CORRAC>2.0.ZU;2-
Abstract
Over the past 30 years, ecologists have demonstrated the importance of flow and temperature as primary variables in driving running water, riparian an d floodplain ecosystems. As it is important to assess the size and timing o f discharge variations in relation to those in temperature, a method is pro posed that uses multivariate techniques to separately classify annual disch arge and temperature regimes according to their 'shape' and 'magnitude', an d which then combines the classifications. This paper: (i) describes a gene rally applicable method, (ii) tests the method by applying it to riparian s ystems on four British rivers using a 20-year record (1977-97) of flow and air temperature; (iii) proposes a hydroecological interpretation of the cla ssification; (iv) considers the degree to which the methodology might provi de information to support the design of ecologically acceptable flow regime s. 'Regimes' are defined for discharge and air temperature using monthly mean data. The results of applying the classification procedure to four British rivers indicates that the 'typical' regimes for each of the four catchments are composite features produced by a small number of clearly defined annua l types that reflect interannual variability in hydroclimatological conditi ons. Annual discharge patterns are dominated by three 'shape' classes (acco unting for 94% of the station years: class A, early (November) peak; class B, intermediate (December-January) peak; and class C, late (March) peak) an d one 'magnitude' class (70% of the station years fall into class 3, interm ediate), with two subordinate 'magnitude' classes: low-flow years (18%) and high flow years (12%). For air temperature, annual patterns are classified evenly into three 'shape' and four 'magnitude' classes. It is argued that this variety of flow-temperature patterns is important for sustaining ecosy stem integrity and for establishing benchmark flow regimes and associated f requencies to aid river management. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, L td.