The recent controversy at Virginia Commonwealth University involving resear
ch ethics raises important and complex issues in survey and pedigree resear
ch. The primary questions are whether family members of survey respondents
themselves become subjects of the project and if they are subjects whether
informed consent must be obtained for investigators to retain private infor
mation on these individuals. This article provides an analysis of the ethic
al issues and regulatory standards involved in this debate for consideratio
n by investigators and institutional review boards. The analysis suggests t
hat strong protections for the rights and welfare of subjects and their fam
ily members can be incorporated into survey and pedigree research protocols
without hindering projects with extensive consent requirements.