Cytotoxicity of cis-[((1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N ')bis(myristato)]-platinum (II) suspended in lipiodol in a newly established cisplatin-resistant rat hepatoma cell line

Citation
S. Kishimoto et al., Cytotoxicity of cis-[((1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N ')bis(myristato)]-platinum (II) suspended in lipiodol in a newly established cisplatin-resistant rat hepatoma cell line, JPN J CANC, 91(12), 2000, pp. 1326-1332
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH
ISSN journal
09105050 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1326 - 1332
Database
ISI
SICI code
0910-5050(200012)91:12<1326:COC'>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The cytotoxic activity of cis-[((1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N')bis(myr istato)]platinum (II) (SM-11355) was evaluated in a cisplatin (CDDP)-resist ant tumor cell line, and compared with that of CDDP. H4-II-E/CDDP with acqu ired resistance to CDDP was established by continuous exposure of a rat hep atic tumor line, H4-II-E, to increasing concentrations of CDDP over 12 mont hs. Compared with the parental cell line, this cell line exhibited an 8.8-f old increase in resistance to CDDP and was not cross-resistant to 1,2-diami nocyclohexane platinum (II) dichloride (DPC). There were no differences in sensitivity to six non-platinum antitumor drugs between H4-II-E and H4-II-E /CDDP, which suggests that H4-II-E/CDDP is not multidrug-resistant. Intrace llular platinum accumulation and the formation of a platinum-DNA adduct fol lowing CDDP exposure were significantly reduced in H4-II-E/CDDP compared to the parental cell line. The acquired CDDP resistance in H4-II-E/CDDP appea red to be predominantly due to reduced CDDP uptake. H4-II-E/ CDDP was also resistant to CDDP suspended in Lipiodol (CDDP/Lipiodol), but was not cross- resistant to SM-11355 suspended in Lipiodol (SM-11355/Lipiodol). Also, ther e were no differences in intracellular platinum accumulation or the formati on of platinum-DNA adducts after SM-11355/Lipiodol exposure between H4-II-E and H4-11-E/CDDP. These results suggest that acquired CDDP resistance in H 4-II-E/CDDP does not influence the cytotoxic activity of SM-11355/Lipiodol.