Cytotoxicity of cis-[((1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N ')bis(myristato)]-platinum (II) suspended in lipiodol in a newly established cisplatin-resistant rat hepatoma cell line
S. Kishimoto et al., Cytotoxicity of cis-[((1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N ')bis(myristato)]-platinum (II) suspended in lipiodol in a newly established cisplatin-resistant rat hepatoma cell line, JPN J CANC, 91(12), 2000, pp. 1326-1332
The cytotoxic activity of cis-[((1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N')bis(myr
istato)]platinum (II) (SM-11355) was evaluated in a cisplatin (CDDP)-resist
ant tumor cell line, and compared with that of CDDP. H4-II-E/CDDP with acqu
ired resistance to CDDP was established by continuous exposure of a rat hep
atic tumor line, H4-II-E, to increasing concentrations of CDDP over 12 mont
hs. Compared with the parental cell line, this cell line exhibited an 8.8-f
old increase in resistance to CDDP and was not cross-resistant to 1,2-diami
nocyclohexane platinum (II) dichloride (DPC). There were no differences in
sensitivity to six non-platinum antitumor drugs between H4-II-E and H4-II-E
/CDDP, which suggests that H4-II-E/CDDP is not multidrug-resistant. Intrace
llular platinum accumulation and the formation of a platinum-DNA adduct fol
lowing CDDP exposure were significantly reduced in H4-II-E/CDDP compared to
the parental cell line. The acquired CDDP resistance in H4-II-E/CDDP appea
red to be predominantly due to reduced CDDP uptake. H4-II-E/ CDDP was also
resistant to CDDP suspended in Lipiodol (CDDP/Lipiodol), but was not cross-
resistant to SM-11355 suspended in Lipiodol (SM-11355/Lipiodol). Also, ther
e were no differences in intracellular platinum accumulation or the formati
on of platinum-DNA adducts after SM-11355/Lipiodol exposure between H4-II-E
and H4-11-E/CDDP. These results suggest that acquired CDDP resistance in H
4-II-E/CDDP does not influence the cytotoxic activity of SM-11355/Lipiodol.