Comparison of four trap types for ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Brazilian Eucalyptus stands

Citation
Cah. Flechtmann et al., Comparison of four trap types for ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Brazilian Eucalyptus stands, J ECON ENT, 93(6), 2000, pp. 1701-1707
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY
ISSN journal
00220493 → ACNP
Volume
93
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1701 - 1707
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0493(200012)93:6<1701:COFTTF>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Eucalyptus spp. plantations represent >60% of the reforested area in Brazil . Although ambrosia beetle attacks on live trees were at first nonexistent, they have begun to appear with greater frequency. Monitoring for pest inse cts is a key factor in integrated pest management, and baited traps are one of the most widely used methods for insect population detection and survey . We compared the efficiency of the most widely used trap in Brazil to surv ey for ambrosia beetles and other Scolytidae, the ESALQ-84 type, with other traditionally employed traps: the multiple funnel (Lindgren trap); drainpi pe; and slot (Theyson) traps, in a Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden stand in Brazil. The ESALQ-84 trap was the most efficient in trapping Hypothenemu s eruditus Westwood and Hypothenemus obscurus (F.); the multiple funnel tra p caught significantly more Cryptocarenus diadematus Eggers; whereas the sl ot trap caught more Premnobius cavipennis Eichhoff and Xyleborus affinis Ei chhoff than the other traps. The drainpipe trap was the least effective tra p overall. When corrected for number of beetles caught per trap surface are a, catches were significantly higher on the ESALQ-84 trap for the majority of the species analyzed, probably because of a smaller trap surface area. T he slot trap was recommended for it caught overall more beetles of the thre e most economically important scolytid species in eucalypt plantations in B razil, P. cavipennis, X. affinis, and X, ferrugineus.