Cah. Flechtmann et al., Comparison of four trap types for ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Brazilian Eucalyptus stands, J ECON ENT, 93(6), 2000, pp. 1701-1707
Eucalyptus spp. plantations represent >60% of the reforested area in Brazil
. Although ambrosia beetle attacks on live trees were at first nonexistent,
they have begun to appear with greater frequency. Monitoring for pest inse
cts is a key factor in integrated pest management, and baited traps are one
of the most widely used methods for insect population detection and survey
. We compared the efficiency of the most widely used trap in Brazil to surv
ey for ambrosia beetles and other Scolytidae, the ESALQ-84 type, with other
traditionally employed traps: the multiple funnel (Lindgren trap); drainpi
pe; and slot (Theyson) traps, in a Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden stand
in Brazil. The ESALQ-84 trap was the most efficient in trapping Hypothenemu
s eruditus Westwood and Hypothenemus obscurus (F.); the multiple funnel tra
p caught significantly more Cryptocarenus diadematus Eggers; whereas the sl
ot trap caught more Premnobius cavipennis Eichhoff and Xyleborus affinis Ei
chhoff than the other traps. The drainpipe trap was the least effective tra
p overall. When corrected for number of beetles caught per trap surface are
a, catches were significantly higher on the ESALQ-84 trap for the majority
of the species analyzed, probably because of a smaller trap surface area. T
he slot trap was recommended for it caught overall more beetles of the thre
e most economically important scolytid species in eucalypt plantations in B
razil, P. cavipennis, X. affinis, and X, ferrugineus.