UK educational administration scholars have undertaken a survey to redefine
the field of knowledge in educational management and/or administration. In
responding to the resulting corpus of work, I argue that that this is an e
xercise in 'turf talk'. I draw on theorizations of the socio-spatialities o
f fields of knowledge to consider educational management and/or administrat
ion and its border scuffles with policy sociology and the exclusion of deba
tes about knowledge and truth claims that characterize the 'new humanities'
. I suggest that the lack of regard accorded the situated empirical and pra
ctical knowledges of practitioners, and the invisibility in the analyses of
the active role of head teacher professional associations in the current c
ontext, places the academy in an adversarial position vis-a-vis practitione
rs. As government moves to make research 'more useful', and positions acade
mics as training providers and management consultants for head teachers, I
propose that educational management and/or administration scholars must mov
e over to share ground and dialogue with the emerging head teacher professi
on.