Launch vehicle structural responses can couple with transonic flow state tr
ansitions at the nose of payload fairings. This self-sustained coupling yie
lds a nonlinear equation of motion that can be analyzed using the force-res
ponse relationship and the periodicity condition. The traditional analysis
approach for this phenomenon, however, linearizes the equation of motion by
converting the alternating flow forces into an aerodynamic damping term an
d defines a stability criterion as the response amplitude that yields zero
net system damping. This work clarifies the relationship between the presen
t and traditional methods, and compares results and conclusions. The feasib
ility of modifying a launch vehicle response analysis of buffeting (random
pressure fluctuations caused by turbulent flow) to include aeroelastic coup
ling effects is also explored. The aerodynamic stiffness and damping terms
formulated herein are consistent with trends observed in wind-tunnel test d
ata. It is shown, however, that the modified buffet analysis can be inaccur
ate, particularly when the aeroelastic coupling contribution does not domin
ate the system response. (C) 2000 Academic Press.