Objectives-This study examined the issue of confidentiality in relation to
i) undergraduate curriculum content in physiotherapy, and ii) the awareness
, experiences and attitudes of clinical physiotherapists.
Design-Postal survey of universities and focus group interviews with physio
therapists.
Setting-Twenty-free universities in the UK and Ireland and 44 therapists in
five hospitals in southern England.
Results-The survey of universities indicated that legal and ethnical aspect
s of confidentiality featured in virtually all preregistration courses that
responded. However, whereas its inclusion was rated as extremely important
, the degree of coverage of confidentiality varied considerably between cou
rses. Within the focus groups, 35 informants recollected coverage of confid
entiality in their preregistration education, and 12 in postregistration in
-service training; in neither case was this coverage in great detail. Infor
mants identified environmental factors and working practices as barriers to
preserving confidentiality. Disclosure to others also gave rise to difficu
lties. Informants were only aware in general terms of the relevant sections
of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy's Rules of Professional Conduct.
Conclusions-Aspects of hospital-based physiotherapy practice were seen to c
reate specific problems in relation to confidentiality. More detailed sourc
es of education and guidance on this issue appear to be required.