Object. Frameless computerized neuronavigation has been increasingly used i
n intracranial endoscopic neurosurgery. However, clear indications for the
application of neuronavigation in neuroendoscopy have not yet been defined.
The purpose of this study was to determine in which intracranial neuroendo
scopic procedures frameless neuronavigation is necessary and really benefic
ial compared with a free-hand endoscopic approach.
Methods. A frameless infrared-based computerized neuronavigation system was
used in 44 patients who underwent intracranial endoscopic procedures, incl
uding 13 third ventriculostomies, nine aqueductoplasties, eight intraventri
cular tumor biopsy procedures or resections, six cystocisternostomies in ar
achnoid cysts, five colloid cyst removals,four septostomies in multioculate
d hydrocephalus. four cystoventriculostomies in intraparenchymal cysts, two
aqueductal stent placements, and fenestration of one pineal cyst and one c
avum veli interpositi. All interventions were successfully accomplished. In
all procedures, the navigational system guided the surgeons precisely to t
he target. Navigational tracking was helpful in entering small ventricles,
in approaching the posterior third ventricle when the foramen of Monro was
narrow, and in selecting the best approach to colloid cysts. Neuronavigatio
n was essential in some cystic lesions lacking clear landmarks, such as int
raparenchymal cysts or multiloculated hydrocephalus. Neuronavigation was no
t necessary in standard third ventriculostomies, tumor biopsy procedures, a
nd large sylvian arachnoid cysts, or for approaching the posterior third ve
ntricle when the foramen of Monro was enlarged.
Conclusions. Frameless neuronavigation has proven to be accurate, reliable,
and extremely useful in selected intracranial neuroendoscopic procedures.
Image-guided neuroendoscopy improved the accuracy of the endoscopic approac
h and minimized brain trauma.