The giving of alms to Shvetambar Jain renouncers is a specific institutiona
lized elaboration of the idea of a free gift, an idea which all the major w
orld religions have their own ways of instantiating, and which in north Ind
ian languages is expressed by the word dan. This example illustrates the in
herently paradoxical nature of the idea of a gift, and why it is a mistake
to define the gift as necessarily reciprocal and non-alienated. Like the pu
re commodity, the pure gift is characterized by the fact that it does not c
reate personal connections and obligations between the parties. This unders
tanding of the gift, which is implicit in Mauss, enables us to resolve the
apparent paradox in the ethnography of dan, that although it is a free gift
it is often harmful to its recipients.