The development and maintenance of expertise in any domain requires extensi
ve, sustained practice of the necessary skills. However, the quantity of ti
me spent is not the only factor in achieving expertise; the quality of this
time is at least as important. The development and maintenance of expertis
e requires extensive time dedicated specifically to the improvement of skil
ls, an activity termed deliberate practise. Unfortunately, determining how
to engage in this deliberate practise is not obvious for tasks such as diag
nosis, which involve high stakes and are predominantly cognitive nature. Re
flection on and adaptation of one's cognitive processes is important; this
could be supplanted by seeking out the opportunity to engage in trial and e
rror in low risk environments such as simulators.
Regardless, most individuals tend to favour well-entrenched activities and
avoid practise. This may be due to lack of awareness of deficiencies in per
formance. However, it may also be due to the individual's conception of the
nature of expertise. Although expertise requires experience, experience al
one is insufficient. Rather, the development of expertise is critically dep
endent on the individual making the most of that experience. As a result, m
otivational factors are fundamental to the development of expertise. Overco
ming deficiencies in self-monitoring is not a sufficient remedy. It is also
necessary is that clinicians form an attitude toward work that includes co
ntinual re-investment in improvement.