Transmission electron microscopy of yeast

Authors
Citation
R. Wright, Transmission electron microscopy of yeast, MICROSC RES, 51(6), 2000, pp. 496-510
Citations number
67
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary
Journal title
MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
ISSN journal
1059910X → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
496 - 510
Database
ISI
SICI code
1059-910X(200012)51:6<496:TEMOY>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The challenges of sample preparation can limit a researcher's selection of transmission electron microcopy (TEM) for analysis of yeast. However, with the exception of thin sectioning, preparation of well-fixed and infiltrated samples of yeast cells is achievable by any reasonably equipped laboratory . This review presents a general overview of TEM sample preparation methods and detailed protocols for chemical fixation of yeast for ultrastructural analysis and immunolabeling. For ultrastructural analysis, the most commonl y used chemical fixation involves treatment with glutaraldehyde followed by either potassium permanganate or osmium. Prior to osmium postfixation, the cell wall must be enzymatically digested to allow optimal fixation and emb edding. Freeze substitution methods continue to provide the highest quality of fixation, but equipment needed for these protocols is not generally ava ilable to many labs. The low viscosity of Spurr's resin makes it the resin of choice for ultrastructure studies. Immunoelectron microscopy has enjoyed great success in analysis of yeast molecular organization. For immunoelect ron microscopy, glutaraldehyde/formaldehyde-fixed cells are embedded in LR White resin. The thin sections are then treated in much the same way as an immunoblot: following blocking, they are incubated in primary antiserum, wa shed, and then incubated in gold-labeled secondary antiserum. (C) 2000 Wile y-Liss. Inc.