The revitalization of surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD) has fueled discu
ssion about the best methodology to define the target. Placement of electro
des for deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires the usual stereotactic techni
que but the argument is mainly centered on whether or not microrecording ne
uronal activity is necessary. We compared the accuracy of calculating the c
oordinates X (medio-lateral) and Y (rostro-caudal) considered by the classi
c stereotactic method, i.e,, definition of the AC-PC intercomissural line b
y MRI and a digitized version of the Schalten-brand's atlas, with final ele
ctrode placement according with microrecording and microstimulation in 21 p
atients. For both the globus pallidum internum (GPi) (n = 21) and the subth
alamic nucleus (STN) (n = 36) there was, respectively, a 43% and 45% mismat
ching of more than 3 mm between the theoretic coordinates and the final sit
e of electrode location. This applies to both the X and Y planes. Accuracy
was not, improved in patients (n = 11) in whom the bilateral procedure was
undertaken in a single day. We conclude that proper electrode positioning o
f the STN and GPi requires fine electrophysiologic assessment.