Knowledge about the comparative safety and efficacy of standard and new ant
iepileptic drugs (AEDs) is limited. Medications are selected on the basis o
f seizure type and epilepsy syndrome, adverse effect profiles, and cost. Ho
wever, there are few data comparing the efficacy of the new AEDs for the tr
eatment of recent-onset versus refractory partial seizures, simple versus c
omplex partial seizures, frontal versus temporal lobe seizures, or other re
levant clinical types. Few studies compare new AEDs. The next best approach
has been the use of meta-analyses and compilation of data from clinical tr
ials, which allow interstudy comparisons to define broad and rough comparat
ive estimates. These analyses, however, do not define clear differences in
the safety and efficacy of the new AEDs because of differences in study pop
ulations. The new AEDs have expanded our arsenal against seizures. As a gro
up, they have favorable safety and efficacy profiles. The challenge is to d
efine the differences in terms of clinical significance.